Error comparison between postpaid and prepaid kWh meter readings under load variations

Visty Chifa Thania, Salahuddin S, Teuku Multazam, Habib Muharry Yusdartono, Dedi Fariadi

Abstract


Load variations found in PT PLN Persero customers, such as resistive, inductive, or capacitive loads, can potentially affect the error rate in kWh meter readings. To determine the error rate of kWh meter readings, it is necessary to compare the reading data from each kWh meter with the measurement data from a 6-in-1 multimeter display. This involves comparing the prepaid digital kWh meter, the postpaid semi-digital kWh meter, and the postpaid analog kWh meter, all assembled in series. Based on the test results, the average reading error rate for resistive loads was found to be 0,11% for the prepaid digital kWh meter, 6,91% for the postpaid semi-digital kWh meter, and 0,36% for the postpaid analog kWh meter. For inductive loads, the average reading error rate was 0,36% for the prepaid digital kWh meter, 7,00% for the postpaid semi-digital kWh meter, and 0,27% for the postpaid analog kWh meter. For capacitive loads, the average reading error rate was 0,09% for the prepaid digital kWh meter, 7,52% for the postpaid semi-digital kWh meter, and 0,62% for the postpaid analog kWh meter. This research is important for the electricity supply industry because the accuracy of electrical energy measurement is a key factor in maintaining operational efficiency and improving tariff fairness for customers.


Keywords


kWh meter; reading error; load variation; multimeter display 6in1

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Sumanto, Y. C. Arif, and S. D. Nugraha, “Alat Pendeteksi Kesalahan Pembacaan kWh Meter 1 Fasa dengan Notifikasi SMS disertai Lokasi,” Energi dan Kelistrikan: Jurnal Ilmiah, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 73–83, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33322/energi.v15i2.2105.

E. Astutiyanti, “Perbandingan Pengaruh Variasi Tegangan dan Arus Terhadap Tingkat Keakurasian Antara kWh Meter Mekanik 1 Fasa dan kWh Meter Digital 1 Fasa,” Universitas Semarang, Semarang, 2022.

H. P. Saragih, “Analisis Perbandingan kWh Meter Analog dengan kWh Meter Digital 3 Phasa Ditinjau dari Segi Error kWh Meter,” Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, 2020.

V. B. Rizqiya, “Analisis Perencanaan Perbaikan Faktor Daya Sebagai Upaya Optimasi Daya Listrik di Gedung E5 Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Semarang,” Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, 2019.

J. M. Tambunan and Jumadi, “Analisis Pengaruh Jenis Beban Listrik Terhadap Kinerja Pemutus Daya Listrik di Gedung Cyber Jakarta,” Jurnal Energi & Kelistrikan, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 108–117, Desember 2015.

S. Anisah, P. Indayani, and Rahmaniar, “Implementasi Beban Resistif dan Induktif untuk Pengujian Kesalahan pada kWh Meter Satu Fasa,” JESCE (Journal of Electrical and System Control Engineering), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–41, Agustus 2019.

T. Hasan, D. K. Elwarin, and S. Sesa, “Pengaruh Kondisi Wiring Terhadap Persentase Kesalahan (Error) Pada KWH Meter,” JE, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–27, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.54463/je.v1i1.3.

R. Hidayat, I. M. A. Nrartha, and I. B. F. Citarsa, “Rancang Bangun Smart kWh Meter 3 Fase dengan Komunikasi SMS Gateway,” Dielektrika, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 140–148, 2020.

Salahuddin, “Perbandingan Energi Listrik kWh Prabayar dengan Pascabayar,” Jurnal Energi Elektrik, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 11–20, 2016.

A. C. Kale, D. F. R. Sirait, M. F. Rizal, I. F. Huda, and A. G. Maulana, “Pengaruh Variasi Tegangan dan Arus pada KWh Meter Mekanik dan Digital Satu Fasa di Sekitar Cempakasari,” Jurnal Majemuk, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32–46, Mar. 2024.

E. Ie, A. P. Launuru, and J. Tupalessy, “Analisis Akurasi kWh Meter Analog Pascabayar dan kWh Meter Digital Prabayar,” Engineering and Science, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022.

B. S. Wibisana, “Analisis Perbandingan Pembacaan kWh Meter Analog denan kWh Meter Digital pada Ketidakseimbangan Beban,” Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2008.

D. P. Sari, “Sitem Perhitungan kWh Meter Listrik Prabayar (LPB) untuk Pelanggan Daya 900 VA PT. PLN (persero) Area Palembang,” Jurnal Teliska, vol. 5, no. 2, 2013.

W. T. Amalia, “Studi Perbandingan kWh Meter Prabayar dan kWh Meter Pascabayar,” Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang, Makassar, 2022.

Lisiani, A. Razikin, and Syaifurrahman, “Identifikasi dan Analisis Jenis Beban Listrik Rumah Tangga Terhadap Faktor Daya (Cos Phi),” Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, Pontianak, 2019.

M. P. Panuntun, “Pengujian Ketelitian kWh Meter Analog dan kWh Meter Digital Menggunakan Beban Induktif,” Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, 2019.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52626/joge.v3i2.47

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal Geuthee of Engineering and Energy is published by Geuthèë Institute.
St. Teknik II, Reumpet, Krueng Barona Jaya sub-district (23370), Aceh Besar District, Aceh Province, Indonesia.
http://geutheeinstitute.com/
ISSN (Online): 2964-2655
The published content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License